Sam Spiczka
Posts:
1,671
From:
Sartell, MN
Registered:
Jul 20, 2001
|
|
Re: Feedback on Articles
Posted:
Aug 8, 2003 1:02 AM
|
|
Finally got a chance to read the new column by Mr. Fallon. The casual, personal tone works well for here I think. It would be nice to have other critics stop by the forum and let us know how they began and what the trials of daily critic-life are like. I find biography very instructive, often more so than words.
The thing that struck me the most (and don't take this the wrong way, Michael) is that there was absolutely no special training/education/skills required to submit a critique. I happen to like that, not being a fan of necessary pedigrees myself. But it does beg the question, "by what standing are you qualified to judge?" Of course, quality of writing is the only valid response, which perhaps is why so many critics are absent here (choosing to let their words stand alone). And the questions could equally be turned to the artist, "by what standing are you qualified to make art?" Their work, in turn, should be their response.
Ideally, both sides act as a check/motivator to the other. At its peak, questions of entitlement would be beside the point. The rigorous drive for greatness would not suffer fools. But if the two are out of balance, things could devolve to infighting, pure politics, and slack work all around. I'm grasping for something here but I think it is elluding me...
On a side note, it would have been nice to dig up a link to the Julie Caniglia article referenced. I admit to being too lazy to run more than a google search on it myself.
Sam
|
|