|
|
Re: thought history for the masses
Posted:
Mar 6, 2003 12:10 PM
|
|
> I think the use of multiple names could even be more
> truthful because it recognizes the complexity of
> identity and thought more than a single name does.
> Even if you always say things you believe to be
> true, the thinking is always more complex than the
> stated idea. Even on this site, I think
> misunderstanding has occurred in part because of the
> limits a single name, and the single viewpoint that
> implies, is used. Perhaps Jaime is ahead of the
> curve on this one, but it does kind-of defeat the
> purpose when everyone knows your alias...
I just love you Sam!!
I am not trying to hide. I am trying to present different facets of my life and how that affects what I think, feel and do. You are dead on when you say that things are more complex than we can get down in words, all artists intuitively know this. But we do have to use words for those whose eyes have been formed in words. Bad education has limited most people to craft driven work as better than expressive work. Most artist have been coddled in a profession of self indulgence and that has created the rift between us. My many names mark an audience that is addressed.
Jaime is just a nice guy; Coyote will trick you into seeing yourself; Coyote Cuatro tricks the person in front of CC and CC is in turn tricked all for the amusement of those watching(lurkers) and for the benefit of the community where the trick is done. Coyote 16 is for the record, history, other parts of the world. Coyote 256 is just out there man.
Jaime
|
|
